Posted on April 24, 2009 at 6:25 AM |
I mean from today's point of view it just seemed like a generic cop movie. Sure, there were a few undertones of racism, and the main character was black, but there was nothing particularly exploitative about it; no gratuitous sex or violence. Plus it had a solid script; it was funny, and the characters were likable. I thought it was great. So what is blaxpoitation? It can’t simply be the presence of African-american protagonists. The Jeffersons and Claudine hardly fall under the “Wham! Bam! Pam!” phase of 1970s Grindhouse cinema.
It’s also important to distinguish between what black film-makers were creating early in the decade, and formulaic, stereo-type driven trash Hollywood executives had turned it into years later. Perhaps it’s the fact that it was directed, starred and was targeted at African-American audiences, and represents a cool, street-smart cat, triumphing over whitey; that and the funky beats of Isaac Hayes. What are you guys thoughts?
The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.
Oops!
Oops, you forgot something.